the software lifecycle, rebuilt for teams that ship with agents
Idea to production. One system.
Planning, code, review, tests, infrastructure and documents on one platform, sharing one graph and one login. People and agents work in the same running branch, so nothing waits on a hand-off.
nothing to install. a branch boots in seconds and your team joins with a link.
one change, end to end
Start with a question. End in production.
Seven steps, one branch, no tool switching. Scroll to walk through it.
Seven surfaces, one graph. rbs builds all of it; the control plane serves all of it.
why now
Your tools assume a human wrote the change. That just stopped being true.
Agents write far more code than people do. The bottleneck is no longer writing it. It is trusting it, moving it and shipping it without a dozen hand-offs.
Trust what agents ship
Every change runs on a live machine you can open. Approvals pin to the commit they judged and expire on the next push. Coverage floors are build failures, not reports. Same gates for a person or an agent.
- SCSarah Chen Approved2h
Half the day was moving code between machines
- git clone && npm installThe branch is already running. You open it.
- “works on my machine”There is no my machine. The branch is the machine.
- waiting on CI for code you did not touchOnly what your change affects gets built and tested.
- a stale .env nobody can reproduceEnvironments are declared, typed and checked before a build.
Fewer seats, no glue code
- a git host + a review toolhosted git with stacked review
- a build tool + a CI vendorrbs, and CI reads the same graph
- an issue trackerissues linked to branches and changes
- a deck-sharing servicedocuments with per-page analytics
- YAML for infra, YAML for CIone language for all of it
why any of that is possible
It knows what your change touches.
One graph holds code, tests, images, infrastructure and CI. Change a function and the system works out what rebuilds, what must pass and what ships. Nobody writes that list.
you change
rebuilds
depends on it
must pass
ci runs
scroll to run it, or hit replay
- 14
- targets affected
- 5
- services and apps rebuilt
- 5
- suites gating it
- 3
- CI jobs, auto-selected
- 0
- config files you maintain
No path globs, no per-app CI files. The pipeline reads the same graph the build does.
where this goes
One graph holds everything. So everything is the same move.
Once code, infrastructure, data and the work share one structure, new products are views of it. These are next, not shipped.
Deployable modules
Code and the infrastructure it needs, as one thing you can start from.
A data workspace
Notebooks whose cells are pipeline steps, running on the same nodes as branches.
Any datacenter as a region
Point deploy targets at your own racks the same way you point them at a cloud.
An on-call agent
Diagnoses production from the graph that built it, not from tribal knowledge.
That is the name. OS: the layer the rest runs on. Reason: a system can only reason about your software when one structure holds all of it.
open a branch
It boots in seconds, your tests are already running, and your team joins with a link. Throw it away when you are done.
Built with itself: this site, its control plane and the editor ship from one graph.